The Cognitive Load Problem: Why Too Many Programs Undermine Learning
NOTE: There is no recording for this webinar.
The Cognitive Load Problem: Why Too Many Programs Undermine Learning
inquirED
Many elementary classrooms rely on separate ELA and social studies programs, creating cognitive overload for teachers and students and breaking learning into disconnected parts. This post explores why fragmentation undermines learning and what coherent, integrated design can offer instead.
Key Takeaways
- Fragmented materials increase cognitive load: Managing multiple ELA and social studies programs raises cognitive load for teachers and students, reducing efficiency and limiting deep learning
- Lack of coherence leads to instructional tradeoffs: When routines and materials aren’t aligned, teachers end up shortening or skipping core work like writing and discussion, and limiting deeper exploration and thinking.
- Coherence strengthens learning across subjects: A unified system for reading, writing, language, and social studies builds vocabulary in context, supports sustained engagement, and deepens comprehension.
Too Many Programs, Not Enough Coherence
In elementary classrooms, teachers and students move across several programs each day, particularly when ELA and social studies come from separate materials with added supplemental supports. Even high-quality programs can create a combined load that is more than any teacher can realistically manage (Sweller, 2011; Kirschner, 2018).
Research supports that concern. When instructional materials are fragmented and there is no coherent alignment across curriculum, instruction, and assessment, both teacher burden and student cognitive load increase. This reduces instructional efficiency and limits opportunities for sustained, meaningful learning (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998; Newmann et al., 2001).
That complexity can make the school day feel like a series of disconnected parts rather than one purposeful learning experience, with frequent transitions, shifting routines, and limited time for deep reading, discussion, and writing.
If you’d like to see how this connects to the time challenge as well, you can read our related post: “The elementary time problem: too many demands, not enough hours.”
What this pressure means for educators and districts
Districts may need to reconsider how many programs teachers are asked to juggle.
When ELA and social studies are separate — with different materials, professional learning structures, routines, and assessments — coherence becomes difficult to maintain, especially across classrooms and grade levels (Newmann et al., 2001).
Schools may need to prioritize instructional alignment.
Approaches that bring reading, writing, vocabulary, and social studies together in a coordinated way can reduce the burden on teachers and make instruction more sustainable. When curriculum, instruction, and assessment work toward common standards and goals, the entire system becomes more manageable and effective (Newmann et al., 2001; RAND Corporation, 2024).
Teachers face daily decisions about what to drop, shorten, or simplify.
In a landscape of competing demands and fragmented materials, something often gives: writing blocks shrink, discussions are skipped, or essential content gets postponed. Over time, the work that requires deeper thinking tends to be the first to be abandoned (Hiebert & Grouws, 2007; Porter, 2002).
{{download}}
Students experience fragmentation, too.
Younger learners benefit from predictable routines and coherent content. When the day is chopped into unrelated segments, much of their cognitive energy goes to adapting to different formats, materials, and expectations — leaving less attention for comprehension, discussion, and writing (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998; Sweller, 2011; Kirschner, 2018).
A call for coherent design and sustainable practice
No matter the district size or schedule, the reality remains: instructional coherence supports deeper, more lasting learning. When reading, writing, language, and social studies instruction live in the same instructional world, students build knowledge more naturally, vocabulary appears in meaningful contexts, and texts, discussions, and writing reinforce one another (Newmann et al., 2001; Hiebert & Grouws, 2007; Schmidt & Prawat, 2006).
More-coherent instructional systems supported teacher confidence while incoherence evoked frustration and anxiety. --RAND, 2024
For teachers, coherence reduces the mental load of switching materials, translating terminology, and aligning expectations across multiple programs. Time and energy shift back toward what matters most: student thinking, growth, and engagement (Kirschner, 2018?
A final note
This challenge is one of the reasons inquirED designed Inkwell the way we did: a single, fully integrated 70-minute daily block where reading, writing, language, and social studies move forward together. Instead of managing multiple programs, teachers work from one coherent structure aligned to both sets of standards. Students benefit from consistent routines, connected content, daily writing grounded in meaningful texts, and a learning experience that supports both literacy and content knowledge.
If you’d like to see how that design works in practice — or explore sample lessons — you can learn more about Inkwell here.
References
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. (2007). The Effects of Classroom Instruction on Student Learning.
Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Cognitive Load Theory: Implications for Learning in Schools.
Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. (2001). Instructional Coherence: The Benefits of a Well-Aligned System.
Porter, A. (2002). Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice.
RAND Corporation. (2024). Coherence in K–12 Instructional SystemsWhat We Know and Where We Can Go
Schmidt, H., & Hunter, J. (1998). Cognitive Load Theory.
Schmidt, W. H., & Prawat, R. (2006). Curriculum Coherence and National Education Performance.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory and Its Implications for Instruction.
Resources
Keep reading
See more of this series
Inkwell First Grade Unit Overview
Get a first look at how our K–2 curriculum integrates core ELA and core social studies into one instructional block.
Start your journey
Inquiry Journeys, inquirED's K-5 social studies curriculum, engages students in inquiry-based learning, strengthens literacy skills, and supports teachers every step of the way.
inquirED supports teachers with high-quality instructional materials that make joyful, rigorous, and transferable learning possible for every student. Inkwell, our integrated core ELA and social studies elementary curriculum, brings ELA and social studies together into one coherent instructional block that builds deeper knowledge, comprehension, and literacy skills. Inquiry Journeys, our K–5 social studies curriculum, is used across the country to help students develop the deep content knowledge and inquiry skills essential for a thriving democracy,
