The Elementary Time Problem: Too Much to Teach, Too Little Time
NOTE: There is no recording for this webinar.
The Elementary Time Problem: Too Much to Teach, Too Little Time
inquirED
Elementary schools face a persistent time squeeze: far more to teach than hours in the day. This post explores how limited instructional time affects teaching and learning — and why integrated, coherent curriculum design can make the school day more manageable and meaningful.
Key Takeaways
- Elementary schedules can’t hold all required subjects: Most schools have just over six hours of instructional time, yet expectations for literacy, math, science, social studies, SEL, and enrichment far exceed the time available.
- Time pressure forces constant instructional trade-offs: Teachers must decide daily what to shorten, skip, or simplify, often at the expense of discussion, writing, and deeper learning.
- Integrated, coherent design makes limited time work better: Curriculum that brings reading, writing, language, and content together allows teachers to use existing minutes more efficiently and reduces the need to choose between essential learning experiences.
The elementary time problem
A national time-diary study found that the typical elementary school day lasts 6 hours and 35 minutes, with about 65 percent of that time spent on academic subjects (Zuzovsky & Jennings, 2002).
But when you add up what schools are expected to teach, including foundational literacy, comprehension, writing, language, math, science, social studies, social-emotional learning, arts, physical activity, and targeted supports, the total often exceeds what the day can reasonably hold (Duke, Lindsey, & Wise, 2023).
We have a serious time problem in elementary schools. When we add up all research-supported instructional priorities, the school day comes up about two and a half hours short. Integration is one of the only realistic ways to address that overload. --Nell K. Duke
That mismatch creates very real pressure for districts, leaders, and teachers trying to make thoughtful choices within tight constraints.
What the pressure means for educators and districts
Schools may need to make intentional choices about curriculum design.
They might consider approaches that streamline instruction: integrating subjects, aligning standards, and focusing on priority skills that fit within the actual time available each day.
Educators face unavoidable trade-offs.
Depth vs. breadth. Enrichment vs. basics. These decisions call for honest conversations about what matters most for students and what is actually possible within the school day.
Equity concerns grow sharper under time pressure.
When time is short, students who benefit from more discussion, scaffolding, or language supports, often multilingual learners or students with unfinished learning, risk receiving less than they need unless structures intentionally protect that time.
{{download}}
A call for realistic scheduling and thoughtful design
Elementary students may be at school for six to seven hours a day, but their learning needs are far broader than that window comfortably allows. When expectations outpace available time, learning can become fragmented or shallow, even with the best teaching.
That’s why schedule-aware curriculum design matters. When materials are coherent, integrated, and built to reflect the realities of classroom time, teachers can focus less on fitting things in and more on helping students learn in meaningful ways.
A final note
This reality is one of the reasons inquirED designed Inkwell the way we did: a fully integrated 70-minute daily block where reading, writing, language, and social studies build on one another. Students make progress toward both sets of standards in one coherent lesson, and teachers gain time back in their day. And because the learning is anchored in rich content, comprehension and knowledge grow together.
If you’d like to see how that design works in practice — or explore sample lessons — you can learn more about Inkwell here.
References
Zuzovsky, R., & Jennings, J. (2002). What Happens During the School Day? Time Diaries from a National Study. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Duke, N. K., Lindsey, J. B., & Wise, C. N. (2023). Feeding two birds with one hand: Instructional simultaneity in early literacy education. In Cabell, S. Q., Neuman, S. B., & Terry, N. P. (Eds.), The handbook on the Science of Early Literacy (pp. 186 – 195). New York: Guilford.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Average Length of School Day and Required Instructional Time in Public Schools. U.S. Department of Education.
Resources
Keep reading
See more of this series
Inkwell First Grade Unit Overview
Get a first look at how our K–2 curriculum integrates core ELA and core social studies into one instructional block.
Start your journey
Inquiry Journeys, inquirED's K-5 social studies curriculum, engages students in inquiry-based learning, strengthens literacy skills, and supports teachers every step of the way.
inquirED supports teachers with high-quality instructional materials that make joyful, rigorous, and transferable learning possible for every student. Inkwell, our integrated core ELA and social studies elementary curriculum, brings ELA and social studies together into one coherent instructional block that builds deeper knowledge, comprehension, and literacy skills. Inquiry Journeys, our K–5 social studies curriculum, is used across the country to help students develop the deep content knowledge and inquiry skills essential for a thriving democracy,
